If you found this file in an archive then put keyword "nutteing3" in a
search engine to find a live / recent version. This and associated files have been on the internet more than 3 years now, known to all concerned in Wiltshire and strange as it may seem nothing libellous in any of the files.
The 1996 Defamation Act amended the Limitation Act of 1980 to give a time limit
of one year for any libel action. I informed all the corrupt bastards in Wiltshire in 2000 and
since then have received no rebuttal letters from individuals or solicitors and no writs.
But of course the main reason there is no libel is the files are just straight
reporting of events without any invention on my part. Anyone thinking otherwise is implying
that the law officers of Wiltshire County Council do not know
how to handle a simple defamation case.
All the files have been
recorded (on www.archive.org ) totally independently with the first file archived
on 19 September 2000 and more than 40 versions of the files over the months and
years since.
Updated file Jul, 2011
Despite official government sites linking to these files there are
still corrupt persons knocking out my sites, so for the
purposes of searchengines cross-linking them, files no longer
available on the original web hosting sites were on
http://www.nutteing.freeukisp.co.uk/ , http://www.nutteing.50megs.com/nutteing3.htm , http://www.nutteing.freeisp.co.uk/nutteing3.htm ,
http://nutteing.no-frills.net/nutteing3.htm and http://nutteing3.no-frills.net/nutteing3.htm and
http://www.nutteing.dabsol.co.uk/nutteing3.htm (last 3 due now to host failure)
http://www.nutteing.batcave.net/nutteing3.htm , http://home.graffiti.net/nutteing/nutteing3.htm
I've not had time to write up the story yet so for the moment some letters
and odd bits and pieces, more like a "weblog". As in the previous file
editorial comment is contained within square brackets [ ... ...].
Résumé of the whole Saga
The conspiracy starts with a woman in her
early twenties desparately wanting a baby but her male partner is infertile. She
hitches up with me and for good measure she sleeps around and soon becomes
pregnant. She leaves me long before the birth so she and her real beloved can
perjurously register the birth of her daughter with him as the father. Later, I
like a fool, plead to this woman for her and her daughter to return to me. This
she does but returns to sleeping around with renewed vigour and promptly becomes
pregnant again. Once again she leaves me but this time her soul-mate decided not
to perjure himself again so the boy is registered illegitimate.
Years pass by
and the woman becomes a social worker. In 1996 her daughter now aged 19 by
means still not divulged discovers my identity and contacts me as her father
based on very spurious evidence. This is considered OK but me contacting my son
with strong corroborative evidence is considered outrageous. The social worker
mother decides the only way to sway me is to come over to Hampshire and in
psychotic rage go on a thousand pound window smashing spree. In the process of
sending written notice to this woman about taking her to small claims court for
compensation I am arrested for harassment. In the intervening time this social
worker had conspired with one of her managers to submit a forged letter plus
other provably perjurous statements about me to the police. For good measure
most of the rest of her extended family also make perjurous or rich statements
to the police. Right from the first court appearance the CPS would not supply
the evidence. Just before automatic abuse of process (6 months delay) the CPS
finally send me "notice of discontinuance" of the ridiculous case against me.
But then the director of social services decided to continue to make threats to
prosecute me. For an unfathomable reason this family wanted me to go public
with the story, reinforced by their wish to take it all to court. So here in
this file and associated files is the whole bizarre story firmly placed in the
public domain.
On the scheduled day of the trial yet another misrepresentational phone call
. At least this time recorded on tape. Who do these morons think they're
sparring with. The caller making out they were trying to contact a Peter
Nutting one time player with Winchester City Football Club by phoning around all
the P Nuttings in the phone book. So yet another disproving exercise. From
Hampshire Football Association I get a phone number of a Winchester City club
official of 20 years. He has never heard of a player called Nutting. I phone
the five P. Nutting listed in the phone book but of course the caller had not
phoned any of them including the 2 nearer than myself. The pratt didn't cover
his tracks by phoning the others listed. Copy of part of this phone
call Anyone familiar with Wiltshire Social Services personnel will
probably recognise the voice on this phone call.
One piece of useful advice courtesy of the CPS. In law I am perfectly
entitled to contact either Fian Dawson or Naomi Dawson as legally I am the
biological father of both. Their mother and by implication Kelvin Dawson
admitted to perjury concerning the registration of birth of Naomi. Fian Dawson
was registered illegitimate and I am the only one to have presented forensically
admissible evidence as to his paternity. It is up to Fian, Kelvin or relatives
of the murdered Mervyn Frank Clarke or any other person sexually involved with
the mother to present evidence. And I thought it was necessary to go to court
to present the case.
The bastards in the CPS knew there was no case. Three days after I was
arrested they would not present evidence in court. Five months on they still
would not forward the supposed evidence especially the criminal record of Stella
Maria CONSTANT and "my" first letter JBS1. I was already aware of the criminal
record of S M CONSTANT relating to the criminal damage of smashing the window so
it begs the question what else are they trying to hide in the criminal record of
this nutter. This implied earlier criminal record of Stella CONSTANT is
something else that Wiltshire Social Services should investigate. Another couple
of weeks and it would have been automatic abuse of process. For criminal cases
with a higher tariff the CPS are allowed to fart about for as long as they like.
Talking to a probation officer I know, the CPS, if they think they can bluff
their way into a conviction then unbelievably they are allowed to do this. My
first solicitor (a woman significantly) understood the psychology of what was
going on with this woman S M CONSTANT. Two months in she went (poached probably
seeing how industrious she was) to another solicitors group. The replacement
solicitors had not a clue. All they wanted was to stay in cosy with the CPS.
They wanted to do the CPS's bidding and get me to plead guilty to this
preposterous charge to show consideration of the feelings of this bloody woman
and her family. Plead guilty and end up with a criminal record and perhaps
community service only was their carrot. I would not have believed a supposed
defence solicitor could be pressured into acting for the prosecution. It just
shows how dangerous "the law" is.
If I had taken the advice of my solicitor and 2 of his senior partners who
were going along with the CPS I could have been in prison now.
The local police are running away from me. I meet up with the WPC who had
warned (sorry "advised") me in May 2000. She visibly flinched and if she had
not been holding on to a stalled car on a slight incline with a broken hand
brake she would have run off I think. I visit the local police station on a
totally mundane matter. On going through the main door 3 coppers I have not
seen before were busy in conversation at the desk. They immediately break off
conversation on seeing me, one beefy plain clothes CID runs out of one door and
another uniformed copper shoots out another door. Leaving a very nonplussed
youngster at the desk to deal with my query. Another time one of the coppers I recognise is
leaving the cop shop in his own vehicle. No other vehicles using the road but
as soon as he sees me he puts his foot down on and stalls his car blocking
the road in both directions as he was turning right.
I am beginning to see why 5
Salisbury solicitors would not handle my defence.
There is probably a guiding principle for solicitors;- don't shit in your
own back-yard. The first Salisbury solicitor was a Bill Bache (in 2007 based in Whaddon) who later acted for
Angela Cannings prosecuted,sentenced and acquitted multiple cot-death mother,
and later Joe Wainwright's appeal against 'shaken baby' killing of his son Josh then Ian and Angela Gay the 'salt child-poisoners".
He was quite happy for him / his practise to act for me
until I told him of the other solicitor in a practise in the same street New
Street, Salisbury who was acting for Stella CONSTANT and the smashed window.
Neither of us could understand why the mental health act had not kicked-in with
Stella CONSTANT, a social worker dealing with other people's children. She
had obviously mis-instructed her solicitor. In this
small hours MPD violent personality she would have absolutely no recollection of
any window smashing - she is as removed from it as if it had been committed by
someone else. I can only assume he accessed a solicitor's grapevine and smelled
corruption and ditched me in the direction of another Salisbury solicitor, but
none of them would touch me. Settlement of the claim for the broken window
almost by return of post with no quibbling about the amount is otherwise alien
to solicitor's nature. They would only advice to get a Hampshire solicitor and
try and get the whole case removed out of the Wiltshire area. The bugbear there
was that all 120, yes repeat, 120 pages of all the witness statements would have
to be re-transcribed and re-typed. One county's CPS is not transferable to
another county's CPS. The only way to get any response out of the Wiltshire
senior Crown Prosecutor was to physically go to Salisbury Magistrates and get
them to plug a phone into a socket in the court-room and in a court environment
speak to him by phone. One of the ushers had to unplug a phone from
their office, take it into court and plug it in there to dial out to the CPS. I talked to a magistrate of
20 years standing and asked her if she has ever had to make a phone call
from the court room. Never in 20 years had she, the nearest was occassionally using
a video conferencing facility in an adjascent room.
I know nothing about the operational criteria for social services but I can see
one reason for the amount of major cock-ups. An overriding precept must surely
be that in any dispute where there are allegations and counter allegations it
must be obvious there are lies coming from at least one side. Whether it is a
family being investigated or one of their own number surely social services
should tend to come down on the side with independent third-party corroboration
and hard documentary evidence.
Letter To Ms Middleton 30 May 2000 The
enclosed is an expose of a Stella Maria DAWSON nee CONSTANT of 4 Nelson Road,
Salisbury believed to be a social worker for Salisbury District Council. She
has recently taken to stalking me, witnessed by 5 independent people. This
culminated in an act of criminal damage, estimated value approximately £700,
witnessed by 2 independent people. She will probably be arrested for this act.
Assuming it was a "cry for help" it will not be on my conscience if she commits
suicide. See (page 16) of the enclosed [printed version of "Oh what a Tangled
Web We Weave"]. I informed her close family of her likely condition and
prognosis re suicide, last year. Hampshire police officers PC -, PC -, WPC - and
PC - are all aware in case you think I'm a deluded nutter. To decipher the
enclosed *. This woman is intent on destroying her own family and I do not like
the idea of her being in a position to destroy other people's families as well.
(page 8)
To the Director of Wiltshire Social Services 06 March 2001 Dear Dr Jones I
am aware of the farrago concerning a Keith Andrews "Marquis St. Ledger" onetime
of your employ. The following is an expose of two more miscreants in your employ
. The prime offender is a Stella Maria CONSTANT, of 4 Nelson Rd, Salisbury
(verified) and her protector a John Barton STODDART, of 1 Shaftsbury Rd, Barford
St. Martin, Wilts. Both employed at Salisbury Social Services. These 2 have
conspired with 6 others in an attempt to prosecute the whistleblower. The CPS
discontinuance notice, copy, is enclosed - too much corrupted evidence/
statements. How Stella Constant was ever allowed to be a social worker is
beyond me. She named her daughter after Naomi - - who was into witchcraft and child
abuse. The male partner of this older Naomi (full name and current address
known to the writer, she even published a poem epitaph to her son but none
of the background of course)
was a - - -. This man killed himself, aged 36, and their son , aged 6, - - - on
or before 11 March, 1979, off the B3011, Heckfield, Hampshire. He was facing
prosecution for the most serious and
gross sexual abuses against children, the reason he also had to kill his
dog that he'd trained. It was the dog , in a sense, that informed on him and more admissably ,
witness testimony from someone fully aware of what was going on in Northam Rd .
On a more disciplinary matter on the 17 November 1996 S. M. CONSTANT
divulged to me details of an ongoing social work investigation before it was
made public. I am nothing to do with social work. This concerned
multigenerational child sexual abuse in Winterslow, Wilts. S. M. Constant on
numerous times harassed me by phone (tape copies available) waking me in the
early hours of the morning. On 3 Oct 1999 I had a conversation with a team
leader social worker I happen to know in Hampshire. I was concerned about this
apparently rogue social worker. He informed me there were sufficient checks and
balances, principaly, all major decisions would go before a line manager before
acted on. I let this obviously aberrant behaviour ride but after she smashed
the 10 foot by 6 foot window on 28th May 2000 I sent a letter to Lyn Middleton
of Salisbury Social Services about this woman. Instead of doing anything about
this psychotic woman I as the whistleblower was prosecuted instead.
Criminal matters concerning S. M. CONSTANT are:- Perjury (admitted in her
police statement of 14 AP 2000). Conspiracy with one other to perjure.
Provable (documentary) false statements to police on 14 Ap and 22 Aug 2000.
Complicity with police to have 3 pages removed from this 22 Aug statement.
Malicious prosecution in a conspiracy with 7 others. Defamement about myself to
my daughter. Mental / emotional cruelty to her own children and family. Murder
in 1977 (Southampton CID are still reinvestigating this unsolved murder so
cannot give any more detail). Stalking (admitted on her 22 Aug
statement), physical harassment and criminal damage [also attempted breaking and
entering which I had overlooked in this letter] all 3 relating to Hampshire
Police crime reference 008089/00 and prosecution. This psychotic behaviour was
witnessed by 2 independent neighbours.
In comparison John Barton STODDART has only submitted provably false
evidence against me, namely letter JBS1. JBS1 is not my handwriting or my
signature. Instead of investigating an obviously deranged employee he did
actively engage in prosecuting the whistleblower. Now any police cases
involving uncorroborated evidence from either of these two social workers at any
time in their careers immediately become suspect. As there is obvious collusion
/ corruption / incompetence to a high level in Wiltshire Social Services copies
of this letter have been circulated to other parties. All statements and the
background story are on the internet on
http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing2.htm and ... /nutteing.htm. All
documentary and physical evidence which would have been presented in court is
available for perusal.
[ Circumstances surrounding the murder of Mervyn Frank CLARKE alluded to as the
murder in 1977 in the above letter are enlarged upon after the affidavit that
raised the whole matter on the "evidence/statements" file number 2 in this
series ]
His reply dated 08 March 2001 Dear Mr Nutteing I have received your letter
dated 6 March. I have copied your letter to Mr Stoddart and I am asking that he
refer it to the Police and the Crown Prosecution Service as continuing evidence
of potential harassment. Yours sincerely sig. Dr Ray Jones Director of Social
Services cc John Stoddart
Red sections are my weeding. This threat cannot be
actioned because the CPS cannot take such a pile of obviously perjurous
statements to court. This threatening letter from the director will be added to
the other evidence concerning misfeasance (abuse of public office).
So I am now at war with the whole of Wiltshire Social Services and their
determination in misfeasance. I sent a letter to the Divisional Commander of Salisbury Police concerning
the tampered-with statement of 22 August last year. I received a far from
adequate reply that did not address my query. From A. E. Dale, Senior
Prosecutions Examiner, Divisional Headquarters, Salisbury I refer to your
letter dated 27th March 2001. I have reviewed the original statements made
by Stella Maria CONSTANT on 22nd August 2000. I can confirm that this statement
consists of two pages only.
In reply to a letter I sent to a the Office of the Adjutant
General, Wiltshire where I had informed them of an auditor for the MoD who had
knowingly made a provably false statement to police.
From F. J. Mason, Detective Inspector, MoD police, CID, HMNB, Portsmouth I
refer to your letter dated 7 March 2001 addressed to _ _ _ which has been passed
to my office. The content of your correspondence and the Wiltshire Constabulary
Charge Sheet enclosed, appear to relate to a harassment enquiry conducted by that
Police Force. Any allegations connected with that enquiry should be addressed
to Wiltshire Constabulary.
Letter to Prof. Economides, Law Faculty, Exeter University Containing an
audio cassette copy of the phone call from Fian Dawson one of his students, 04
Sept 1999, starting at 00. 37 hours. For legal reasons (1953 Post Office
Communications Act) I had to bleep-out the swearing. The content does not
square with his police statement of 4/11/2000. What an extraordinary way to
start a legal career.
To the manager of Daniel Cobb, Estate Agents, London, 15 March 2001 Dear Sir/Madam On 30 Jan
2000 I received an e-mail from address naomi@-.co.uk which I assume belongs
to a Naomi Leafe-Marie Constant/Dawson. It was not offensive as such but did
confirm the malicious nature of herself and her 7 co-conspirators in prosecution
of me. Since 3 March 2001 the CPS has had to drop the case against me because
there was just too much false evidence and testimony to proceed with the case.
I am now legally in the position where I can reply. On 8 March 2001 I received
a phone-call from Leafe. Because of all the false statements made against me any
communication with any of these 8 has to be in writing. I told Leafe to put
whatever she had to say in writing to me. As she hasn't I have to assume the
content would have been malicious. [ I will not get into circular arguments
with any one of these people. Everything has to be evidence based as far as I
am concerned. And I will not transcribe any more of their tosh coming to me by
phone. ] N. L. Constant although made false statements in her 4 Nov 2000
statement to police they are not of sufficient gravitas to warrant counter
action for perjury unlike most of the other conspirators. N. L. Constant could
not have had knowledge of my phone number (via the CLI {1471}) before Sept
8, 1996 because I did not know their number before 5 November 1996 let alone ever
phoning it. She is still trying to cover-up the identity of her informant about
my name / phone-number.
Email Communication
There follows what can only barely be called a series of communications
between myself and ex-daughter. Apart from anything else it shows what
psychiatrists term folie à deux or Shared Psychiatric Disorder. Or should that
read folie à huit as it was eight people in a conspiracy to maliciously
prosecute me. More properly it is representative of folie à famille. Quote
from the Journal of Comprehensive Psychiatry 1985, Mar-APR, Arthur Lazarus quoting
Dewhurst and Todd " .. criteria generally regarded as prerequisite for the
diagnosis of folie a deux: (1) evidence that the partners have been intimately
associated, (2) identical or near identical delusional content and (3)
acceptance, support and sharing of each others' delusional ideas. " Also
"the dominant partner's delusions are continually reinforced by a kind of
feedback mechanism due to the incessant echoing of her beliefs by the weaker
member" It is also probably demonstrative of PAS Parental Alienation Syndrome
her deliberate and provably false statements to police picked out below are
symptomatic of this condition.
Email "communication" between 10 April
and 29th April 2001
^ To Paul ^ I didn't call you the other night to
say anything malicious. I just want ^ to say that I am going travelling and
be.g. you to stop all this internet stuff. ^ I am so tired of all this and I
feel you have proved your point. I am 24 ^ now and this has been going on for
years. I just want to leave and know that ^ things are O. K. ^ Please I
am begging you, take all the private information off the ^ internet. If you
care about me at all then please do this for me. ^ Leafe
How dare you blame me for dragging things out for years. I wanted it sorted
out in 1997 but you dragged that evil bitch of a mother into things. Of course
things aren't OK if that bastard and her co-conspirators had got her way then I
might be in prison now and a large fine. That could well have been the result
if I had gone along with the advice of my solicitor and 2 of his senior partners
in one of the city's most respected criminal law practices. July 21, 1999 I said
I would be taking all this into the public realm. Everyone had their
opportunity to stop me. Their wish for going public was reconfirmed by their
taking it all to court. I have not proved my point. I have assembled all the
evidence available to me from both sides, the proving would have been in open
court. Just be grateful your lie in your police statement concerning how you
found my name and phone number is not as serious to constitute perjury as your
other conspirators have done. Of your extended family only the two sisters
acquitted themselves with any honour. I can only assume that as they are both
medically trained they picked up on the
Dyschondrosteosis
Dyschondrosteosis stuff and stayed well
clear of conspiracy. I have been hardened-up too much being forced to deal with
you bastards to take any notice of moral blackmail. Putting all this stuff in
the public domain is one of the few protections I have against corrupt practices
. There are probably other people in the Salisbury area stitched up by these 2
dangerous social workers. [Stella Constant trained as a social worker at
Southampton University, graduating in social work studies, 1987 ] I am obliged to correct any transcription errors that I
have made typing up all the tosh from you lot. Please inform me of any such
errors concerning the prosecution statements.
^ There is no reason to be nasty to me! ^ I have not lied to the
police, that is exactly how I found your number and ^ name. I have no reason
to lie over such a trivial matter. I am not a liar ^ and resent you calling
me one. I have never been nasty to you or caused ^ trouble for you. I will
ask you again to take all that stuff from the ^ internet, it is private and
not for any weirdo to read. ^ Do you remember me begging you not to tell my
family about my ^ paternity-well you went ahead anyway. I want it to stop
now, everyone knows and I see ^ that your job is done now. I refuse to let
this nonsense go on any longer and ^ want to know if there is anything I can
do to help. ^ All this nastiness has had a terrible impact on me and my
brothers life ^ and wish that we could all put this behind us. None of this
is our fault.
This is quoted from your statement
"On my return from "storming out" I saw my mum hang up the telephone, I was
suspicious because it was late. After she'd left the room I [did -struck out
ND] dialled[caretted] 1471 and noted the number had a * code. I suspected my
mum had been speaking to Paul. I looked in my mum's telephone book and noted
down Paul's telephone number - I never told mum or dad that I had done this.
"
This event was before 8 Aug 1996 (your first call to me). I did not know
your Nelson Road number until 5 Nov 1996. That bitch never ever phoned me
before 5 Nov 1996 at any time going right back to 1975 and I never phoned her at
any time back to the 70s. I think their Middle Woodford number was in the book
but I never phoned there even the weekend I stayed there. Incidentally
, countering the statement of Honoria Constant, I met her then and also once when
she visited 200 Empress Rd. If my number was in some book of your mothers a) It
would not baldly state Paul Nutteing 01962 * it would be codified at least to
just "P" and no need to mention 01962 b) I imagine there would be something like
10 * numbers in that book c) The only reason for it being there was if she was
my phantom silent phone pest over a few years in the 80s early 90s. d) When you
phoned me the first time you were absolutely certain of my identity. One of the
biggest wierdos I have come across is your mother- its disgusting how she had no
consideration for her own kids. All the internet stuff stays there until
someone confirms your statement in writing to me that I am "lying and deluded"
via proper documentary evidence. I repeat for the umpteenth time all that was
required now as back in 1997 was an exchange of letters between GPs confirming
blood-groups. A perfectly reasonable procedure in the circumstances. I still
have had no explanation why KD Dawson is not down as father in Fian's birth
registration. If that dangerous nutter still thinks the murdered Mervyn Frank
Clarke is his father then someone should remind her he was murdered on 24 Dec
1977 and count the weeks to 27 Oct 1978. I was living with that woman between
June 1977 and the first week of June 1978
^ I feel as if you are making a
mountain out of a mole hill-which isn't even there! ^ I will tell you again-I
HAVE NOT LIED TO YOU OR THE POLICE. I have never ^ once lied to you, and I am
very tired of you trying to tell me otherwise. ^ I expect this to be the
end of this nonsense once and for all. To be ^ frank-YOU WEREN'T EVEN THERE.
^ I will ask you again, will you please take everything off the
internet? ^ Also, if you reply could you refrain from swearing-I find it very
distasteful ^ and irrelevant. ^ Thank you
I repeat I did not know your mother's phone number before 5 November 1996.
You cannot have dialled 1471 at any time before that to find my phone-number or
me phoning from any Winchester number. This is just your first lie. Then you
say I was expecting your call the first time you phoned me-another lie. Your
first phone-call was totally out of the blue. Show me the letters that I was
"writing to every hotel in Leicester" [rereading these witness statements the
word written here is not "everyone" but "every hotel" which is not just a lie
but ridiculous fantasy no wonder I misread it first time round ]. Where is the
evidence I went checking your "credit history". The perjury section is marked in
blue in the following and the marginalia are my comments and annotations because
of the poor quality of printing. The full transcript is in the second of these
internet files. Quote from her police witness
statement with her signature at the bottom of the sheet. "I find it quite
disgusting at the lengths he seems to go to track me down, writing to
every hotel in Leicester to find where I was working and finding out my
"credit history" to try to locate me. "
[She is now the second
generation of perjurors. She also lied about letters I was supposed to be
sending to her via Salisbury and lying that she divulged her Salisbury home
phone number and address in her first phone call to me on August 08, 1996
] You have obviously inherited from your mother the capacity for pathological
lying to suit your own purpose and cannot even see it when you are caught out
lying-a signature of pathological lying. Just be grateful these lies are not of
sufficient gravitas to add you to the charge of conspiracy to pervert the course
of justice. All sorts of people lie for all sorts of reasons but an inability
to recognise it and covering up with yet more lies points to much deeper
problems. The only time I lied to you was, laughably, I was trying to disguise
your mother's promiscuous behaviour. I knew I was lying (misdirecting
actually, failing to add pertinent detail) when I wrote it at the time. When I
was caught out lying there was no point in denying it.
^ Why send that last email back to me-I am not interested and you
are ^ talking nonsense. ^ WILL YOU TAKE THE STUFF OFF THE INTERNET-YES
OR NO-THAT IS ALL I CARE ^ ABOUT-Not your insane ramblings!!!
Fulminate as much as you like but I don't get into circular arguments with
you lot. Only proper evidence will sway me. I would have thought by now you
would know that lies, perjury, conspiracy, intimidation, threats and violence do not
get anywhere with me. You still have not presented any evidence to counter my
"insane ramblings" or substantiate that I am "lying and deluded".
^ Nice to see how you view me-a pathalogical liar. Doesn't seem to
matter ^ what I say, you are convinced of that-well so be it. I know the truth
and that ^ is all that counts, how you view me is of no matter too me. ^
I will ask you one last time-will you take all the stuff off the
internet????????????? ^ If you do not answer my question, I will not contact
you again.
I quote from your mother's statement "In 1995 [a member of the family
-struck out SMC] LEAFE found out that Kelvin was not her biological Father, and
queried this with me. I gave LEAFE the "basic" details of her Father, Paul
NUTTEING and the reasons she was brought up as Kelvin's child. LEAFE accepted
this and made no mention of her intentions to contact him. I did not know
Paul's address at this time as we had not kept in touch. " Unfortunately on
this occasion I believe your mother as she had not kept in contact and had no
reason to lie about knowing where I lived. She would never record any details
about me that could be discovered by Fian or yourself nosing around. My name
and address has always been in the phone book since first going on the phone in
1979. On the other hand it would be very difficult for KD Dawson at all times
while at home make sure that his blood group, disclosed on his military
pass, could not be discovered. [Where did I find out what is on a military
pass when I don't know anyone in the military ? I just dropped into an army
recruitment shop and asked. One of the 2 civvies-dressed bods there produced his
pass from his wallet and showed me the bit with his blood group, covering up the
rest. Oddly he even told me the blood group of his daughter being "A" and how it
matched the mother, not himself, as he was "O". ]
^ There is clearly no point in corresponding with you, you are clearly
insane. ^ I think you have a very evil mind and you desperately need
psychiatric help. ^ Unfortunately nobody cares about you enough to insist on
you doing this. I ^ feel very sorry for you, there is *. Everybody ignores
your letters ^ as it is clear to anyone who reads your letters that you are
mad!! ^ Everyone is laughing at you behind your back, and you are too deluded
to see ^ it. Everyone who as ever received one of your letters or read your
* ^ are convinced you need help, you are so pathetic. ^ I am laughing
at you, mum is laughing at you, my dad, all my friends, social ^ services
even the police are laughing at you!!! ^ GET A LIFE! ^ Your embarrassed
biological daughter
^ You bang on about wanting evidence, well the evidence speaks for its
self: ^ that everything you have ever written or published has no
construction and ^ is basically 'insane ramblings'!! ^ As far as dad not
being on Fian's birth certificate -IT IS SOOOOO OBVIOUS. ^ You think you are
so clever but everyone with half a brain knows that if you ^ are not married
the father has to be present-otherwise you could name the ^ pope if you
wanted too. Now on that day (you have 6 weeks to do this min) my ^ dad
couldn't be there and therefore could not legally be put on the birth ^
certificate. Everybody knows that and again you are making a fool out of ^
yourself. ^ I have shown so many people all the letters and the internet
stuff-and they ^ all worry about your mental state. Which is quite ironic
really coz you ^ don't stop banging on about mum's mental state-but then she
is not ^ *. Have you ever wondered why nobody replies to your ^ letters,
well pure and simply they think you are insane and want to steer ^ clear.
^ I have never known anyone as deluded as you, but then I have a
sneaking ^ suspicion that you know there is something wrong with you but you
are too ^ scared to face it-am I right Paul? Do you really think that the way
you ^ *, the way you talk are signs of a normal person-NO!!!! ^ You are
the next best thing to a tramp living on the street. ^ Your increasingly
embarrassed biological daughter
Don't lecture me about Registry Office matters. When your mother registered
Fian she (by law) would have been given a statutory declaration form (form 16)
for KD Dawson to fill in. This has been the case since the Births and Deaths
Registration Act 1953, Sections 10 and 10A. Any father abroad would have to go
before a JP, commissioner for oaths etc, fill in the form and post back to the UK
. "In the case of the father who is a member of Her Majesty's Forces serving
abroad, the authorities before whom the statutory declaration may be made include
any officer who holds a rank not below that of Major". And posted back to the
UK registry office. After their marriage in 1981 KD Dawson should have filled
out form LA1 official
site Now http://www.gro.gov.uk/gro/content/births/canichangethebirthrecordatalaterdate/birth3f.asp apparently
"Application by the natural parents for the re-registration of their
child's birth following the parent's marriage". He has not done so and cannot
do so because in great big print at the bottom of the form WARNING: ANY PERSON
WHO DELIBERATELY GIVES FALSE INFORMATION FOR THE REGISTRATION OF A BIRTH MAY BE
PROSECUTED. Until he does so KD Dawson is not Fian's legal father.
Should you wish to change your birth registration details then it is a
matter of contacting Corrections Service ONS Smedley Hydro Trafalgar
Rd Birkdale Southport PR8 2HH
As a succinct portrayal of most aspects of this business without getting
bogged down with all the written evidence of perjury etc, is the following. On
01 Nov 2000 after the court case against me had nominally started I checked the
CLI (1471) on my home phone. Someone with a Salisbury phone number had tried
waking me in the middle of the night. I faxed the OIC at Salisbury Police in
these words that that evil bitch Stella Constant had been harassing me again. I
got a stern phone call back from this CID officer. Stella Constant vehemently
denied making any call and demanded that Salisbury Police find out how I got
hold of this woman's new, changed, ex-directory phone number. [Salisbury
police now know that this psychotic woman lied to the face of a police officer
with the evidence of the following audio tape recording. This is the MPD /
fugue state at this time of night where she is split away from the usual self.
She has absolutely no recollection of whatever she does in this state including
the reason for bruised toes from kicking things or people] The BT CLI (1471) sound
recording 440K I recorded the BT CLI on tape saying " telephone number
01722 5065 .. called on the first of November at 01. 31 hours " and sent a copy
to Salisbury Police. This officer sheepishly phoned back enquiring what I was
going to do about this latest matter. I said as long as it was on record for
the forthcoming court case then that was as far as I was taking it. So in one
minor exchange involving minimal but irrefutable evidence this woman has shown
that 1) She has a mental health problem 2) Is unlikely to be allowed to
work closely with Salisbury Police on any social services matter as her position
with them is now untenable. 3) Prejudiced any court case against me and
involving the veracity of her testimony in court.
One of the people I have kept informed about all this is a team leader *
section of * social services. We happen to have known one another since about
1972.
^ You are sick in the head, you desperately need help!!
^ Maybe you would like to give me the telephone number of this social
worker ^ you know-I would like to talk to him. If he is such a * then I
think ^ that would be a good idea-that is if you have nothing to hide.
The social worker is * on *. I talked to him today so he is aware of your
suggestion. He is at home this weekend and Mon to Fri after 6 pm. The other
person is * on *, long term friend since 1970 or so. We lived in the same house
for 3 years. Both these names and phone numbers are for you only, not to be
relayed to your mother or anyone else.
^ I may well not be using these numbers as I am flying out on Wednesday.
I ^ will not be near a computer-hopefully therefore will not contact you
again. ^ Farewell
Going by your recent groundless diatribe you have turned into a carbon copy
of your mother. The more public exposure of such a dangerous family then the
better. I do not have the imagination to dream up what is otherwise such an
unlikely story. If you want to go along with maintaining your mother's fiction
with no evidential backing then more fool you. [Both mother and daughter went
to La Retraite school Salisbury, I wonder if there is any significance in that.]
The above is part of the letter from the Coroner From Her
Majesty's Coroner, K St. J. Wiseman, Director General's House, Southampton I
have now in fact been able to find the old file of my predecessor in relation to
the death of Mervyn Clarke. You have correctly indicated to me that an
"Open" verdict was recorded on the basis that there did not seem to be any
evidence available to assist in discovering the circumstances in which Mr.
Clarke came to be found on the pavement with the head injury that caused his
death .
Letters to Mr Golding head of mental health section of Wiltshire Social
Services and Mr J Pook, team leader over Stella Maria Constant, Wilts Social
Services
This is the final chance to get any sense out of Wiltshire
Social Services before I start criminal proceedings against Stella Maria
CONSTANT and John Barton STODDART of Wiltshire Social Services. Charges being
provable perjury and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. Soon after I
became aware of letter JBS1 I had an interview with my MP. He has been kept
informed since with view to bringing in the ombudsman. Mental health problems
start in the Constant family with Michael Ellis CONSTANT. Newspaper report of
his sectioning in 1984 is included. His daughter is Stella Maria CONSTANT who is
now causing so much mayhem. Her daughter a Naomi Leafe CONSTANT / DAWSON is now
showing folie a deux. Recent e-mail "communication", copies enclosed, between
myself and her show she is severely unbalanced and there should be concern for
welfare. I have also enclosed a copy of a letter I sent to the Director of
Wiltshire Social Services and his useless asinine reply.
Nothing, not
even acknowledgement to these letters
30 June 2001 Letter to local social services, children and families
section There is no point in informing me this letter should be going to
Wiltshire social services. I have sent letters the width and breadth of Wilts
social services personnel. In time honoured manner they tried prosecuting me as
the whistleblower. Wilts CPS notice of discontinuance is enclosed. I have also
enclosed copy of threatening letter, from the director of Wilts social
services, that cannot be actioned because of too much corruption in his staff; the
John Stoddart, area manager, referred to, submitted a forged letter purporting
to come from me as police evidence against me for starters. I will have to
bring in the ombudsman on this misfeasance and criminal prosecutions for perjury
and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. Instead of input from police
and CPS it should be input from psychiatry.
There is reason for concern for
welfare of two twin boys of a mother who is a social worker in children and
family section of Salisbury Social Services. Her name is Stella Maria Constant
of 4 Nelson Rd, Salisbury. The twins are - and - Dawson born -, -, 1994. The only
explanation of events since 1997 is that there are severe psychiatric problems
with this family. Starting with a Michael Ellis Constant whose sectioning was
reported in the regional press in 1984 (copy enclosed). His daughter probably
has Dissociative Identity Disorder or something similar. Her delusions written
up as true statements to police in April and August 2000 now constitute perjury.
She has a dangerous personality disorder that manifests itself in the early
hours of the morning. She was arrested and prosecuted (Hampshire Police crime
reference 008089/00 )for a window smashing escapade last year again at about 00
. 30 hours. During the working day she can function as any sane minded person.
Another example of this behaviour is highlighted in yellow [her denied but
conclusively evidenced phone- call to me at 01. 31 on 01 Nov, 2000 ]in the
copies of email "communication " between myself and her daughter Naomi Leafe
Dawson between 10 April and 28 April 2001.
The delusions of the mother have been
induced into her daughter to the extent that her daughter cannot function
properly, psychiatricaly this is called folie a deux. But aged 24 social
services cannot have any input on that, nor can my GP. As far as I can see my
only option is to start criminal proceedings against Stella Constant, her
daughter, her son Fian Dawson and her husband Kelvin Derrick Dawson for their
provably perjurous statements to police, conspiring to maliciously prosecute
me. This will long-term achieve nothing as it is psychiatric attention that
should be to the fore. I have deliberately not included my phone number so that
all correspondence on this matter is in writing.
Her reply As the
content refers to matters relating to Wiltshire Services, I have forwarded your
letter to Dr Ray Jones, Director of Social Services. * we have no jurisdiction to
intervene in the matters raised in your letter
Data Protection Act - Subject Access - Wilts Social Services
The first proper communication in 1 1/2 years from anyone in Wiltshire County
Council Letter dated 09 Aug 2001 Dear Mr Nutteing Wiltshire County
Council has investigated your request for information held about yourself in
accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998. I have retrieved the data you
have requested from Social Services. I enclose the data, which is not exempt
from disclosure; I am still continuing my searches and will forward any
subsequent data shortly. In the mean time should you have any queries
, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours Faithfully, Jens
Christensen, Data Protection Officer
Nothing of much use forwarded to me
except this letter, heavily weeded ( redacted ) 6 July 2001 Dear Margaret Many thanks
for arranging for {about 8 characters blacked-out} to forward onto (sic) me the
letter dated 30 June 2001 received from Mr Paul Nutteing of _ _ _. Mr
Nutteing's {2 lines of text blacked out}. It has been referred to the
police and also considered by the Crown Prosecution Service. {3 and a half
lines of text blacked out} My suggestion is that you might acknowledge back
to Mr Nutteing that you have received his letter, and that as it refers
essentially to matters in Wiltshire you have forwarded the letter to me.
Many thanks for letting me know about the contact you have had with Mr
Nutteing. Yours sincerely, Dr Ray Jones, Director of Social Services Cc to
John Stoddart {plus one blacked out} {3 lines of text blacked
out}
The red sections are my weeding
More evidence that my persecution is from Wiltshire Social
Services rather than from individuals who happen to be personnel of Wilts Social
Services. This witness notification went to Salisbury Social Services and not 4
Nelson Rd Salisbury. The second tranche of papers from Wilts County Council
Data Protection Officer again contained mainly copies of letters I had sent.
Curiously with large areas blacked out ; why they consider I should not see
parts that I had written and have copies of, is beyond my understanding. For
the letter I sent 30 June 2001 to local social services, printed earlier in this
file, the blacked out words are :- John Stoddart [then in cryptic marginalia
referred back to this name "John Stoddart (include ) not exempt DPA " and
signature initials, someone had added to my letter] Stella Maria
CONSTANT Names of the twins not named here for the usual humanitarian
reasons Michael Ellis CONSTANT Hampshire Police crime reference
008089/00 Naomi Leafe DAWSON Stella Constant, her daughter, her son Fian
Dawson and her husband Kelvin Derrick Dawson
The corrupt bastards in
Wilts Social Services surprise, surprise, have not sent me a copy of my alleged
"initial letter" JBS1 of 11/4/00 with "hand-written envelope" that John Stoddart
"did not reply to as he did not wish to encourage me" Why did the
slimey John Stoddart make this reply to my May 30th, 2000 letter but not to the
"my" forged letter - he knew it was forged in all probability.
15
August 2001 The second proper communication in 1 1/2 years from anyone in
Wiltshire County Council even if from an unnamed woman. First of all she had to
get past my identity non-divulging or confirming telephone answering technique.
It was just a "courtesy call" to confirm I had received the package from Wilts
County Council Data Controller.
Another dodgey phone-call asking for a Mr Lloyd saying they could not read
the last digit of a phone-number it might be 2 or a 7. They repeat this call.
Half an hour later I ring the other local number with the different digit and of
course no one had previously phoned enquiring after a Mr Lloyd.
My
efforts at investigating a previous dodgey phone-call from someone in an office
without suppression of the identity of their phone line on the CLI detailed in
the first of these files. I filled in the complaint form
concerning misfeasance and sent to the Local Government Ombudsman in
Coventry
This is his reply dated 23 August 2001 from the Assistant
Director
The Ombudsman has asked me to thank you for your complaint
against Wiltshire County Council. I must first explain that under the
provision of the Local Government Act 1974, the Ombudsman has no power to
investigate any matter which relates to a personnel issue regarding an officer
of the Council. In this case your complaint is about the way in which the
Council went about investigating the allegations that you made to it about a
social worker falls outside the Ombudsman's jurisdiction. Secondly, I should
make it clear that the Ombudsman has no power to investigate an action of an
officer of the Council which is not taken as a part of their duties at the
Council. In this case it seems clear to me that the actions of the officers'
concerned were taken in a private capacity and were actions they were entitled
to take as citizens rather than as officers of the Council. As such these
actions fall outside the Ombudsman's jurisdiction. Lastly it seems to me
that any injustice you have sustained falls from the actions of the Police in
arresting you and not from any administrative action of the Council ant it is
the case that allegations of perjury are matters for the Police. Whilst I
recognise that this reply will come as a disappointment to you I do not believe
there are any matters in the complaint that you raise that fall within the
Ombudsman's jurisdiction. I am therefore, closing the Ombudsman's file in
respect of your complaint and I am notifying the Council's Chief Executive of my
decision. Yours sincerely Stephen Purser Copy of the above letter
The red sections are my weeding.
So here are the details in a private capacity of these citizens who keep
threatening me. John Barton STODDART, of 1 Shaftsbury Rd, Barford St.
Martin, Wilts married a Helen R. Winchester, Northwich, Cheshire 1976 Dr
Raymond Leonard Jones, Bleet Meadow House, Bleet, Steeple
Ashton, Trowbridge, Wiltshire Born 1949, Redruth, Cornwall Married a Mary
Elaine Abbott, 1973 in Sutton Academic doctor, qualifications BSc, MPhil, PhD
(Bath 1983, 560p) - thesis "Adolescents' Perceptions of Social Work and Social
Workers" Onetime lecturer at Bath and now an Honorary Research Fellow of the
Centre for Evidence Based Social Services at Exeter University. Laughably
, this is someone who is Director of the "Trowbridge Centre for Hearsay Based
Social Services".
Does he
practise what he preaches
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0, 4273, 4244399, 00.html
or http://society.guardian.co.uk/socialcare/news/0,,541525,00.html
, 23 Aug 2001,
If this article fails to emerge from the Guardian
archive then try clicking again. He is now heading a Quango "Social Care
Institute for Excellence -Scie - pronounced "sky" - will be the first central
body responsible for reviewing research and practice in social care,
establishing a database of good, evidence-based methods and services. " No
he could only hack that job for 7 months and September 2002 is returning to a
post in Wilts Social Services which should be problematic managerially speaking.
As a rule it is considered inadvisable for companies, I don't know about local
government, taking back previous employees. It all concerns disruption of power
blocs that build up around individuals in companies. He was director from 1992
to 2001 i.e. 9 years, the current director was only at Wiltshire as assistant
director for 1 year.
I am certainly learning why Social Workers have an increasingly bad press
;they just act on hearsay with no corroborating hard, forensically
admissible, evidence from independent third parties or even all involved sources
. As you can see from the above mini biography when I investigate something I do
it to the best of my abilities. Even his academic record has the disguised
incomplete name he uses still in official letters. How on earth can anyone in
social services take the non-evidence backed word of Stella Maria CONSTANT when
everyone including the CPS knows (admitted on the first page of her 14 April
2000 police statement) that she is a perjuror
email of 27 August 2001 to
the office of the local government ombudsman Dear Mr Purser I have in
front of me 2 threatening letters on official green-printed headed notepaper
from the director of Wilts Social Services. Would you kindly inform me how I
differentiate letters in a private capacity written on council notepaper and
letters of an official capacity written on the same council notepaper.
A useless reply just restating his grounds for non-investigation.
A consequential letter to the chief executive officer of Wilts County
Council Dear Dr Robinson, I am led to believe you would have received an
assessment from the local government ombudsman Stephen Purser (copy of his
letter to me enclosed). I have to inform you that the director of social
services a Dr Raymond Leonard Jones has been abusing his position as a local
government officer. He has been using official printed Wiltshire County Council
headed notepaper in an unwarranted campaign of trying to prosecute me (copy of
one such letter enclosed. ) Instead of investigating the corruption or
incompetence in two of his staff he has tried prosecuting the whistleblower. It
has also shown-up incompetence in his own abilities as he, as well as his
staff, have totally failed in taking evidence from all parties. Apparently they
have just relied on uncorroborated hearsay from one corrupt Wilts social worker
who even admits to previous perjury on the first page of her first police
statement, then goes on to repeatedly provably commit more perjury. The
background to this matter is too convoluted to even try and summarise here. It
is placed on the internet at:
- http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing3.htm and associated files *
* Yours Sincerely
As a result of my third letter to Wiltshire
Constabulary this time to the Chief Constable, Elizabeth Neville, I finally get
a proper reply from Chief Inspector HOBBS of Salisbury Division. 12 Sept
2001 I refer to your letter dated 18th August 2001, and to my subsequent reply
in my letter dated 29th August 2001. I have now received the file in
respect of the matters to which you refer, and I have examined the original
statement, the copy of which was sent to you. The original statement is two
pages long, and it is quite clear that the officer recording the statement
incorrectly put the figure "1" in the space marked "consisting of ... pages".
This figure "1" was crossed through with a squiggly line making it appear on the
photocopy as a "5". The number "2" was placed alongside the crossing out.
Whilst the alteration was not initialled by the person making the
statement, it would appear that the failure to get this alteration initialled was
an oversight by the officer taking the statement. There have certainly not been
any pages removed from the statement itself, and you are incorrect in assuming
that this was the case. I can confirm that your requests to have your DNA
samples and fingerprints destroyed, together with the result of this case being
removed from police records, has been passed to Scientific Support Department at
Police Headquarters, Devizes. You will receive notification direct from them
when this has been completed. I trust this clarifies the position in
respect of this matter. Yours sincerely Ian D HOBBS Chief Inspector
Operations (Criminal Justice)
Because of the international and general significance the following section
is no longer here but is much expanded on separate files starting from
DNA Profiles
12 Dec 2001 my opening salvo in the form of a letter to the new director of
Wilts Social Services. Annie Alexandra Hudson director of Wilts social
services - Some background Probably born 1947 in or near Doncaster, South
Yorkshire Trained at Sussex University early 1970s, then social worker in
Newcastle, then lecturer in social work at Sunderland Poly, then lecturer at
Manchester University incl. 1985 to 1989, then social worker at Bristol incl.
1992 to 1998, assistant director of Wilts soc. services from 2000.
Bad penny time again returns to Bristol 2003 as social services director for children.
Author or
co-author to such luminary articles as : Troublesome Girls, Femininity and the
State Malestream (sic) training? Women, feminism and social work education
The child sexual abuse "industry" and gender relations in social work
Feminism and social work - resistance or dialogue Changing perspectives -
feminism, gender and social work Towards an effective policy for delinquent
girls Women, oppression and social work The Welfare State and adolescent
femininity "No Man is Safe" - The Welfare State, Social Work and Adolescent
Girls. I found no general social work tracts only a preoccupation with
feminism. And they think I'm obsessive. I hope the above is not similar to the
hang-up of Carole Baptiste in the Haringey - Climbie enquiry. Carole Baptiste
was a local manager social worker obsessed by christianity and feminism.
Devoting case discussions to these topics to the exclusion of proper social
services matters. That dangerous social worker was convicted on 27 August
2002.
Copy of letter to the new director of Wilts Social Services 12 Dec
2001 Dear Ms Hudson
Because of the corruption (perjury and use of a false
instrument) of two of your staff: Stella Maria CONSTANT, of 4 Nelson
Rd, Salisbury and John Barton STODDART, of 1 Shaftsbury Rd, Barford St. Martin and
the incompetence of the previous director Raymond Leonard JONES, Bleet Meadow
House, Bleet, Steeple Ashton, Trowbridge I have been put to much inconvenience and
expense to say the least. I have to pay the Forensic Science Service the sum of
10 pounds to have my DNA sample destroyed along with the biometric data derived
from it, it is not an automatic procedure. If I don't receive recompense from
Wiltshire Social Services by 10 January 2001 I will start the necessary. Unlike
your incompetent staff I don't act without proper evidential backing so evidence
of this expense is enclosed. If you are not aware of the background to all this
it is on the internet at http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing3.htm and the
associated files. Her reply "Following discussion with our
legal advisors. I am writing to inform you that I do not consider that Wiltshire
County Council should meet the costs (i.e. £10 as stated in your letter) of paying
the Forensic Science Service to have your DNA sample destroyed. The reason for
this is that I do not believe that the sample was taken as a consequence of Miss
Constant, Mr Stoddart or Dr Jones carrying out their professional duties as
employees of Wiltshire County Council. Annie Hudson Director of Social
Services"
[ In the following latest letter to Annie Alexandra Hudson the evidence
referred to is on the second of these files " Crown v Paul Nutteing " file
nutteing2 as search engine keyword ]
15 April
2002 Name, Address Telephone number deliberately withheld
Ms
Hudson The enclosed extensive documentation is the evidence of perjury and
conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. The bona fides of the affidavits
can only be verified through a trusted intermediary. These people made the
affidavits despite knowing that Stella Maria CONSTANT could well come round and
smash their windows if I divulged their full identity. The photographic evidence
is much more straightforward. Papers W1, W2 The principal pieces of
perjury are the police witness statements of Stella Maria CONSTANT and her
husband Kelvin Derrick DAWSON, MoD auditor, both of 4 Nelson Rd Salisbury. Re red
marked sections - SMC Constant didn't move out of my house to Winn Rd in 1977 it
was the first week of June 1978 she moved. Her son Fian was conceived early Feb
1978. For KD Dawson to be the father the mother has to admit to sleeping around.
This was the principle reason it was not possible to live with this
person. Papers marked P1, P2, P3, P4 P1 - Contact prints from negatives with
code number meaning film stock of 1977 all photos show rooms in 200 Empress Rd
where I lived then. Negative number 5 as print lower down. The part of the image
next to the pink dot is shown copier-enlarged. At the end of the orange arrow is
text of a local newspaper. P2 shows a page from the archive of this paper for
the sports pages on Monday 27 February 1978. Lower left is a proper enlarged
image off this negative number 5. The lower right overlay celluloid shows the
main points of comparison. The ascenders and decenders of the caption marked C,
the areas of white, the 2 stars marked S with surrounding white and the pattern
of words shown on the original as "Sandown and Shanklin". The "Greyhound racing"
caption was quite common but rarely at the right hand edge of the page. The use
of the stars and spaces never occurred adjasent to this caption in any other
edition from 2 months before Feb 27 to 3 months after 27 Feb 1978. This is more
than ample forensic evidence that this particular photo was taken on or after 27
Feb 1978 (SM Constant became pregnant about 3 weeks before this date). Thus
dating all the subsequent images which show toys and a distinctive heavy playpen
so S M Constant was not snapped just visiting me. Other shots on this set of
negatives show her in night attire. The photo numbered 1 is shown overleaf. P3
third down shows a now ex-friend after 20 years of friendship with SMC. From a
child health visitor she estimates the ages of the older kid as 1 year to 18
months (born 27 Nov 1976) and younger as 8 to 10 months (born May 05, 1977 ). The
2 upper photos were taken in Surrey on 04 June 1978 visiting my family. The
babe-in-arms was born 18 April 1978. SMC was 4 months pregnant. She started
moving out from my house the week before the 04 June and completed moving after
this weekend with my family. P4 evidence of the settlement cheque for the damage
only aspect of the act of terrorism of S M Constant on 27
May, 2000. Affidavits A1 to A5 All fairly straightforward but the identity
of these good people has to be un-divulged. They could be verified by an
independent party contacting these people to confirm but not relaying their
identities to any of the dangerous or corrupt people in your workforce.
B1
and B2 birth registrations. Re B1, as of 9 April 2002 and later checks from the registrar at
Bugle St, Southampton this registration remains unaltered. K D Dawson has not
completed form LA1 and submitted for reregistering the birth. So F G Dawson
still has no legal father. B2, SM Constant admitted to perjury in her police
statement regarding this registration. M1 finally evidence that someone
around here can function as a proper social worker (myself).
Reply from
the Director of Wiltshire Social Services I am writing to acknowledge receipt
of your recent letter (15 April). I have noted your comments. However, I do
not believe that it would be appropriate for me to make any further comment
although I will be passing on a copy of your correspondence to our legal
advisors. Yours sincerely Annie Hudson
Second Arrest by Hampshire Incompetent Plod
Thursday 05 Dec 2002
About 2 pm at home and 5 deliberately unnamed CID police and a special branch
character invade my privacy. Reason given was to
investigate as I was supposed to have incited someone
to commit criminal damage.
Someone, presumably BT had told them I also used another
line that they had no records for - how confusing for the poor dears -
crap BT computer system for that.
Special Branch and plod spent 3 hours delving into
anything and everything that could conceivably
be connected to my computer. Including, because
the wiring was wrapped up with but not connected to
the telephone wires, a 30 year-old doorbell and 20
year-old burglar alarm.
Computer and telephone hand-piece would you believe
bagged up and carted off expecting to find fancy
hacking software but only ordinary internet
browser and email application.
I had put some public domain info on one of my files linked
to a cutting from an old newspaper with a flippant
6 word phrase. Half hour police interview, recorded on tape, where it
was only me coming up with relevant material. The
duty solicitor only had to make one relatively minor
point.
Apparently arrested because of these six words buried in
120, 000 or so words. Inchoate offence, no "actus reus", no "mens rea" and
no incitees.
The way round this sort of nonsense charge is make sure the notional
"non-damage" is over 5,000 pounds. Notional damage in excess of
300 million pounds would have been sufficient.
Then section 45 and Schedule 2
of the Magistrates' Court Act 1980 and Law Commission Report No 131
section 2.138, 2.127 and 2.136 once it is at Crown Court.
A cover for getting hold of my computer
which of course shows nothing untoward.
As far as plod was aware the sensitive information about
the siting of the FSS NDNAD store of DNA samples could only be obtained by me
hacking into some secure government computer.
They, using Vogon software, or anything else would not find any
fancy hacking software or any other compromising material on my computer.
What they fail to realise is if I find anything useful or interesting
it goes in the public domain anyway. I have no need for encryption or to
keep stuff quiet unlike all this lot.
I am carted off to nick for questioning. I happen to have very good
peripheral vision. The lead copper was to my side
and I was talking to his colleague opposite. Because of a ridiculous
charade that can only be due to the input of corrupt Wiltshire social
workers I made the statement. "If you have had any input from anyone in
Wiltshire Social Services over this stuff then you should be very wary". At this point
I could see that the copper by my side started grimacing.
I don't have a copy of the police interview tape despite the machine
making 3 contemporaneous copies.
Questions about my 6 word phrase linking to a newspaper article
from a national newspaper article from the archives.
Why did I have details of Dr P E Cage, director of Birmingham
Forensic Science Service on my site ? My reply : Well I have evidence
of administrative incompetence at his facility and I don't see why
such people should hide behind anonymous civic edifices.
According to these interviewing plod, Dr Cage has since retired.
Why did I have details of (then ) Home Office minister John
Yorke Denham on my site? My reply: I never got an answer
why 2 of his staff lied to him about phoning me a few days after
a dangerous psychotic Wiltshire social worker came over to Hampshire
to smash windows and the buck stops with him - it was his phone-line
and his corrupt staff.
Why did I not accept that my 4 internet sites had been disabled?
What is the point of publicising the activities of corrupt and dangerous characters
if I don't keep it in the public domain. Afterall there is nothing libellous
in any of my material.
Why the material about burglars leaving other people's DNA profile
material at their "scene of crime".
I have no problem with DNA profiles being used to identify, say,
a body washed up on a beach. There is then a proven
intimate association between the body tissue sample and the
derived DNA profile. In most other situations there is only
an unproven casual association with a crime or criminal. I have been
on the receiving end of a conspiracy of corrupt people manufacturing
"evidence" against me. The deliberate planting of DNA "evidence"
is just too easy for any numbskull to do these days.
Released without any bail conditions.
It does not resolve the central issue addressed in my
letter to the Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary
Quote
18 January 2003
Dear Mr Kernaghan,
On 05 December 2002 I was arrested by police only identified to myself as
officers A, B, C, D, E and 00. Someone had alleged that I had hacked into some
secure government computer to acquire some very sensitive information. No
fancy modems or software found on my computers of course. As I correctly
stated in my police interview there should have been 4 related items on the
print-out before us and not 3. The "Fourth Item" would be on a "need to
know" basis even within the police. Even a chief constable, I suspect, would
not be privy to this knowledge as there would be no routine operational
reason for him to have the full details that I am privy to. I, in fact, found
this information perfectly legitimately on a totally public access
" ... .gov.uk" internet website open to the world to view. The particular
government file contains other information I would have thought most
advantageous to any terrorist or the like.
After my interview and having left the custody suite of (the) police
station I gained access to the "secure" inner sanctum of the police station
and for 5 minutes had the freedom of the unlocked rooms. I was observed but
unchallenged by 3 uniformed officers and 2 CID bods despite wearing a -
- and -. I was only rumbled by the character who only 10
minutes before had been interviewing me as a "criminal suspect". He
compounded matters by being so flummoxed he failed to search me before
conducting me back to the public world.
Amazingly 6 weeks on the " ... ...gov.uk" site and file, as of 17 Jan 2003
is still up there available to all and sundry. I should be knighted, not
hounded, for exposing such security lapses and incompetence from national
down to local level.
Copies of this letter sent to local and national media.
Yours Sincerely,
End of quote
A useless reply just stating the bleeding obvious.
05 March 2003
Interviewing plod "A" brought my computer
back (working order) with a letter neither
named nor signed
Quote
On 5/12/02, you were arrested and detained by
a police officer in connection with an allegation
of Incitement to cause Criminal Damage.
Your assistance in the removal of the contested
information has been noted and it is expected this co-operation will
continue and not be reversed. After careful
consideration it has been decided that no further
action will be taken against you in this matter.
However, if further significant evidence becomes available at a later
date, the decision may be
reconsidered and the advice of the Crown
Prosecution Service sought.
Yours sincerely,
(no name, no signature)
Officer in Charge
End of Quote
Not even a proper phone number just the county-wide
crime-reporting number. A further example of the
police state we are moving into.
Before I was arrested superplod removed
4 of my mirror sites and I opened up 8
more to replace. When I could get back on
line I edited out the quote, the 6 word phrase
and the sensitive material and superplod
has since left me alone. I have now replaced the
original mirror sites. Superplod gave up when they
were confronted by my Russian site. It is all in Russian so
any email that they make to that site to have my files
removed would in all probability have to be in Russian. The
only solution they could see was to get local plod to
arrest me.
So all they have achieved in the end is confirm the
sensitivity of the Oldbury address. They hounded my sites
while there was reference to a 5 year-old newspaper report
connected by a commonplace 6 word phrase to some
addresses in Birmingham. All special branch have done is
confirmed the secret nature and identity of one of the crown jewels.
I had put a number of possible addresses on my site but the print-out
before us had had one of the addresses edited out, what a give-away.
I pass on the following without any added comment from myself and they will have to charge the likes of the FSS and home-office with some sort of nonsense inchoate offence, preceded by the source URL in the public domain.
From
http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmpubacc/321/32103.htm
(ix) The National Audit Office's report highlighted eight serious security breaches at FSS premises over the previous two years, which included an arson attack at the Wetherby laboratory resulting in £750, 000 of damage and the loss of all available forensic evidence in 37 cases, some involving serious offences. We are concerned that no one was held accountable for these lapses in security. Staff have a personal responsibility to comply with security requirements, and the FSS should in future be prepared to take appropriate disciplinary action against staff whose inattention to these requirements leads to security breaches (paragraph 27).
(x) FSS premises contain items of value to criminals, whether in the form of forensic evidence or quantities of controlled drugs. There is a risk that organised criminals will try to infiltrate the FSS. The FSS should draw on the experience of other agencies dealing with the criminal community, both in this country and overseas, on how this risk can best be addressed (paragraph 28).
http://www.nao.gov.uk/pn/9798689.htm
several serious security breaches have occurred. One of these, an arson attack at the Wetherby site, destroyed items of forensic evidence and had severe financial consequences for the FSS. Independent security reviews concluded there was a need for improved security at FSS sites. The FSS has already acted on some of the recommendations of the most recent review and had set an action plan to improve physical security and security practices over the three years from 1997.
http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm38/3889/ho-173.htm
3. The FSS failed this target in 1996-97 due to an arson attack at Wetherby, which severely disrupted services, and the delayed commissioning of the second DNA analysis unit in London.
http://www.thisisyork.co.uk/york/archive/1999/03/31/news6VQ.html
First published on Wednesday 31 March 1999:
Wetherby forensic lab criticised for poor security
The Forensic Science Service was urged today by MPs to step up security to stop thefts of vital evidence and drugs from its laboratories, including the one it runs at Wetherby.
The Commons Public Accounts Committee said a National Audit Office report had highlighted eight serious security breaches at FSS premises over the previous two years.
These included an arson attack at the Wetherby lab which caused £750, 000 of damage, and the loss of all available forensic evidence in 37 cases, some involving serious offences.
There have also been at least three thefts of drugs from the Metropolitan laboratory. MPs said today they were "concerned" no-one had been held responsible for the security breaches and "dismayed" the FSS had failed to take timely action after a 1991 security review.
They warned: "FSS premises contain items of value to criminals, whether in the form of forensic evidence or quantities of controlled drugs. There is a risk that organised criminals will try to infiltrate the FSS.
"The FSS should draw on the experience of other agencies dealing with the criminal community, both in this country and overseas, on how this risk can best be addressed."
During evidence sessions, the FSS agreed with the committee's suggestion that it take advice from the US on drug organisations' attempts to infiltrate criminal justice agencies.
The FSS became a Government agency in 1991, since when its caseload has risen by about 50 per cent to some 97, 000 cases a year and is expected to keep growing.
MPs said the Home Office had assured it the FSS was managing the workload without compromising quality.
But the FSS met only 72 per cent of delivery dates agreed with customers in 1997-98 against a target of 90 per cent. It expected to achieve 80 per cent in 1998-99 but had so far achieved only 74 per cent. Noting the FSS was taking steps to improve delivery, MPs warned: "Delays in making results available may impair the effectiveness of criminal investigations."
http://www.newsint-archive.co.uk/pages/SearchSampleResults.asp?pubsel=TIM&SrchText=wetherby+&DateFromDD=10&DateFromMM=Nov&DateFromYY=1996&DateToDD=28&DateToMM=Nov&DateToYY=1996&ResultListMax=100&head=&byline=§=&SortOrder=desc&SortField=Date&Submit1=Search&BackDD=Day&BackMM=Month&BackYY=Year&source=thetimes&SortField=Pub&SortOrder=asc&SortField=EDN&SortOrder=asc&SortField=Page&SortOrder=asc&ST=NS&SortSpec=&ResultMaxDocs=100&Site=ALL&Collection=NI&ResultCount=20&summreqd=yes&indexkey=30A10472783946822935E180
The Times
WED 13 NOV 1996
Ed: 4m1
Pg: 7
Word Count: 63
Arson fear at police science lab; News in Brief
A fire at the Forensic Science Service laboratory in Wetherby, Yorkshire, on Monday night may have been started deliberately in an attempt to destroy evidence, the Home Office believes. The laboratory is one of seven serving police forces throughout ...
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs/hoar9.html
8.9 During 1996/97 an arson attack at Wetherby damaged part of the laboratory site and, in particular, impacted on DNA delivery. This had repercussions throughout the organisation. However, contingency plans were put into operation and disruption to customers was minimised. The estimated cost of the fire was £0.8m. This is the first time anything of this nature has occurred. As a result, security reviews in progress at the time were expedited and their recommendations have been accepted. Plans are also being developed to increase the general level of security throughout the FSS.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article7034345.ece
Howdenhall, Scotland , 18 Feb 2010 "Lothian and Borders Police said that a masked man threw incendiary devices at several windows on the ground floor of the building before escaping in a getaway vehicle driven by another man. Residents reported hearing banging noises from within the building at the time of the attack."
I estimate at least 50 police man-
hours spent chasing scotch mist.
You would think they have better
things to do, but obviously not the
case in Hampshire Constabulary.
Just for the record this oh-so-sensitive information is printed on page 229
of the HMSO "National Asset Register, 2001" in any major UK library
Frontispiece states "Presented to Parliament by the Prime
Minister, by command of Her Majesty, July 2001"
Also on the internet at
HM Treasury site
Named with inspired lunacy after Professor Sir Alec Jeffreys the inventor of DNA profiling
note not Jeffrey's in the address.
Oldbury Facility, Jeffreys House, 1 Wharfside, Rounds Green Road, Oldbury, West Midlands, B69
2BU: a purpose built industrial building used partly as a store and partly fitted as office and
laboratory space. Occupied from 1997 on a 20-year lease until 2017; 1012 square metres.
And further background again in the public domain from
5 May 2001 New Scientist Pages 10-12. http://www.newscientist.com (archive free but registration required) Quote
The DNA Police
By David Concar
IN THE US, it would be protected by steel doors and armed guards. In
Britain, anonymity does the job. Tucked away on an industrial estate
near Birmingham, you'd scarcely know the brick-and-glass building was
there-let alone that it houses the biggest collection of human DNA in
the world. A collection that's getting bigger and more contentious-by
the day.
For years, police in Britain have been quietly exercising their right
to collect saliva swabs from almost anyone they take into custody.
Those swabs now fill scores of industrial freezers in the basement of
the anonymous looking building. Upstairs, a database holds over a
million DNA profiles based on these samples. And because crime never
stops, up to 3000 new samples arrive every day.
End Quote
So much for anonymity one arm of government tries keeping
it secret and the same time another arm is publishing the address.
No wonder they don't like the idea of open government - they
can't keep the wraps on information as it is.
They have to have this backstop of stored DNA samples for everyone
profiled because the science is flakey. No one can be sure a particular
DNA profile truly represents a DNA sample until it is multiple-tested.
They also need it for cross-comparison on international database trawls.
I don't know the identity of these dangerous plod who go around
arresting people for having information in their possession that is
firmly in the public domain. Also for taking the word of corrupt
Wiltshire social workers who at least Wiltshire plod know to be corrupt.
You can perm 5 from the following list of plod known to operate recently
from the same station. They're presumably all tarred with the same brush.
DI Richard (Dick) PEARSON
DC Roger VIVIAN (now there's a connection)
DC Alan SETFORD
Sgt Michelle COOK
DC Stephen WHITE
DI Tom TOBIN
DS Chris BUSE
DS Simon BAKER
DI Gary O'FLAHERTY
DC Keith BAILEY
DCI Bob DUNCAN
DC Jenny OLDEN
Det Sgt Richard ROWLEDGE
DI Brian MITCHELL
DC Kate GUNSON
DS Phil JONES
DC Nick CLARK
DC Toby ELCOCK
DI Derek STUBBINGTON
DS Alan BETTS
DS Howard KILEY
Sgt Tony DAVIS
DS Phil BATEMAN
The eldest one of the lot was the one who arrested a Mark Hansen
(Mark David W. Hansen, age 44, died sometime before Nov 2000) and killed himself in the New Forest the next day, probably a Terry Bailey.
If you find all the above story hard to believe then wait until you read the
following story concerning the weird and wonderful practises of Wiltshire Social
Services. Another true story that would be impossible to invent Keith
Andrews 04 May, 2000 Was http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0, 4273, 4014426, 00.html If this article fails to emerge from the Guardian archive then try
clicking again. Incidently an example of a well researched piece of
journalism. If the anonymous informer on Mr Andrews had revealed his identity
then he too would probably would have been prosecuted as an administrative
convenience. That way they could have carried on in their own gullible
indifference.
Log of sites/files had taken down by the opposition in Wiltshire
Now only
readable by using the "Wayback Machine" The
Internet Archive and putting in the search box the original URL
20
Nov 2001 http://nutteing.freeservers.com Hello Paul Nutteing, Your web
site is in violation of our Acceptable Use Policy. Specifically, your page
contained material or content that is racist or otherwise offensive to others,
including content which aggravates, harasses, threatens, defames, or abuses
others. If you have any questions, you may refer to our Acceptable Use Policy
located at http://www.freeservers.com/policies/acceptable_use.html. Regards,
Abuse Team Post script In June 2002 they informed this freeservers site
was available to re-use so I have now resurrected it. I do hate these "file not
found" statements due to corrupt people trying to suppress information.
10
April 2002 http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing2.htm Dear User, We have
received a number of complaints about the allegedly defamatory content of your
postings regarding { http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing2.htm }. We must
remind you that the Freeserve user conditions subject to which Freeserve is made
available to you require you not to use Freeserve "to transmit or post any
material which is defamatory, offensive or of an obscene or menacing character,
or which may, in our judgement, cause annoyance, inconvenience or anxiety to any
person." Your postings regarding { http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing2.htm }
put Freeserve at risk of libel proceedings and accordingly we will be suspending
your { http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing2.htm ) website as of 09:30
April{10}th 2002. However, if we receive your written undertaking that you will
remove the allegedly defamatory content from your website, then we will be happy
to reinstate your { http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing2 ) website. Kind
Regards Freeserve Webmaster
They're still at it November 14 2002
http://www.nutteing.no-frills.net/ was pulled down. So
http://www.nutteing3.no-frills.net/ and 2 more off shore sites started by me.
Why do these people want this material propagated all over the place.
Rogues Gallery
The above pictures show Naomi
Leafe Dawson or Naomi Constant or whatever she calls herself now and a picture
of someone (before she started lying) (sound recording)
she referred to as being identical to her brother - a teenage picture of
myself. Take my face and replace the eyes with her mother's eyes and you get the
daughter. Raymond Leonard Jones aka Ray Jones ex-director of Wiltshire
Social Services now CEO of the qango, the so-called Social Care Institute for
Excellence. Sorry no he could only hack that for 7 months and well what do you
know he is turning up like a bad penny to Wiltshire Social Services in or after
August 2002. The sub-human of a mother Stella Maria CONSTANT - I
don't have a recent picture of this person. For a non-pixelised image
-of S M Constant on a more suitable site please click here
Det. Insp. Sean Memory
To summarise the whole piece. These files stay on the internet exposing a
group of very dangerous characters until: Kelvin Derrick DAWSON and Stella
Maria CONSTANT come up with independent evidence that they were living together
between January and May 1978 to show they did not commit perjury. There is now
on the second of these files in the area of the photographic evidence,
unimpeachable forensically admissible dated evidence that S M CONSTANT was still
living with me after 27th February 1978. Kelvin Derrick DAWSON commits
perjury again by signing registry office form LA1. Until he does he is not
legally the father of Fian Gerald DAWSON, not having adopted him either.
Naomi Leafe DAWSON / CONSTANT shows me the letters I sent to hotels in
Leicester trying to find where she lived and the evidence I checked her credit
history. Fian Gerald DAWSON convinces me that his phone-call of 04 Sept 1999
was reasonable and that his blood group is compatible with that of Kelvin Dawson
and incompatible with mine and that he does not have the inherited medical
condition of mesomelia. John Barton STODDART, South Wilts area manager of
Wilts social services, shows that letter JBS1 is my writing and signature.
Raymond Leonard JONES aka Dr Ray JONES demonstrates he is competent to be
director of Wiltshire Social Services or even just Head of Adult and Community
Services. Specifically he shows that he obtained forensically admissible
evidence from all available sources before trying to bring in the police and
CPS. In relation to Stella Maria CONSTANT going around smashing windows and destroying her own family
http://www.gscc.org.uk/NR/rdonlyres/8E693C62-9B17-48E1-A806-3F6F280354FD/0/Codes_of_Practice.doc
Code of Practice for Social Care Workers and Code of Practice for Employers of Social Care Workers
5 As a social care worker, you must uphold public trust and confidence in social care services.
In particular you must not: ...
5.8 Behave in a way, in work or outside work, which would call into question your suitability to work in social care services.
Until section 82 of the 2001 Criminal Justice and Police Act is repealed.
While I am still deemed a criminal because of section 82 of the 2001
Criminal Justice and Police Act and Birmingham Forensic Science Service and the
perjurous and corrupt actions of others then this material stays in hyper-space. I have found nothing in Hansard relating to discussion of this section 82 in parliament so in my books that makes it an illegal imposition.
Not one of the above has satisfied the relevant criteria and it is
now, of writing, January 2002 a year and three months since I was arrested also
two years since this all went in the public domain on the internet. It is now
five years since S M Constant started lying in earnest to the whole of her
family. I have informed close family, extended family, social services and now
the public domain. As usual with these sorts of matters nothing will be done
until after this nutter jumps off a cliff. The irony is I will be the only one
without a guilty conscience being the only one actively doing anything
constructive. Prosecuting the whistleblower solves nothing. In any dispute one
side or other must be lying. The only way to get nearer the truth is to rely on
incontrovertable documentary evidence and testimony from totally independent
people i.e. not friends or family. I would have thought if social services were
functioning professionally they should have requested my evidence. I could get a
vicar, or some-such trusted but independent third party, to make certified copies
of my evidence. Give this vicar the names, addresses, phone numbers of my defence
witnesses to verify their bona fides and get him to send on copies with
identifications removed to social services.
Outside a court environment with
such corruption around I could not allow direct contact with the people who were
good enough to make affidavits etc in my favour. Especially when there is a
dangerous nutter still on the loose in Salisbury who believes in smashing
windows and violence.
A principal tenet of the Peter Principle (Lawrence
Peter, 1970) " People are promoted to their level of incompetence "
There is a systemic failing within social services. See the cases of Lauren
Wright
Lauren
Wright and Norfolk Social Services was http://society.guardian.co.uk/children/story/0, 1074, 561496, 00.html , 01 Oct 2001, Ainlee Walker and Newham Social
Services, Victoria Climbie and Haringey Social Services and John Anthony Smith
and Brighton and Hove Social Services; social workers John Barrow and David
Pamely sacked in July 2002. Barrow
and Pamely ... ... ... ... and
come-uppence For social services failures add the cases of Maria
Colwell, Jasmine Beckford and Rikki Neave.
Social workers go along with unsubstantiated hearsay from directly involved
parties rather than testimony from independent third parties and
incontrovertible evidence. Someone comes up with plausible and reasonable
statements of explanation ;the very people who have made a lifetime's practise
of lying and manipulating and social workers get taken-in hook, line and sinker.
In any investigation by social services the golden rule should be - everyone
is a liar until proven otherwise by independent proper forensically admissible
evidence.
If you have found this file in an archive then
put keyword of "nutteing" in a search engine to find an updated version, also
some sites do not support the .wav sound files.
For anyone with further
interest in this story then copies of the affidavits, documentary
evidence, photos or even taped phone calls, used as evidence, could be made
available. Obviously, outside a court environment, some identifying features would
have to be deleted.
. Oh What
a Tangled Web We Weave 70K
